Each portfolio company runs Unloq on its own data and keeps its own decision record, in whichever of the three set-ups suits it, from its own cloud to a private, encrypted space on ours. Every record is kept the same way: what was decided, on what evidence, what it was expected to deliver and what it did. Definitions are agreed and written down company by company, so anyone comparing two companies can see which figures are measured the same way.

A portfolio company needs one decision worth getting right, a named person who owns it, and read-only access to the data behind it. That can be a live connection or a single export to begin with. Our data team does the connection work, so nobody in the business has to become a data engineer first. A first decision goes live in three to ten weeks, depending on how many systems are in scope.

The head of AI owns Unloq inside the company and sets the rules it runs by, from definitions and limits to who approves what. Unloq runs next to what their team is building, so Unloq becomes one of their recommendations to the business. Every decision that goes through Unloq is measured against what it was expected to deliver, so they have results to show the board. See how Unloq supports AI adoption.

Unloq keeps a record of every approved decision, measured against a baseline agreed before the work starts, from the first month of ownership onwards. By exit, the value creation plan can be read back as a series of decisions with what each one delivered, which is easier to defend in diligence than a summary written afterwards. Book a demo and we will start with one company.

We agree how we work with the fund first, including the fund’s review of our data security, so that work is not repeated for each company. Each portfolio company then starts on one decision of its own and keeps its own decision record, which its chief executive brings to the portfolio review alongside the monthly pack.